On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:06:21PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Ah... Here is the first patch which adds eth_hw_addr_inherit() > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/269365/ > > > > I don't think we've actually set dst->addr_len yet at this point so > > it doesn't do the memcpy(). This doesn't work. > > Ouch. Yes, I see. The net_device is allocated using kzalloc just a few > lines earlier and there is no ether_setup or similar. Actually, it > doesn't look like it ever sets addr_len. Is that right? Does it work > even before this patch? Ha ha. That's a very good question. I have no idea. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
