Re: [PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:54:05PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:04:16PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> >> Using an int which is casted to unsigned char as inbuf is messy.
> >> The code won't work on big endian systems.  The patch should fix
> >> this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Frederich <jfrederich@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch doesn't apply at all, can you refresh it against my
> > staging-next branch and resend it so that I can apply it?
> >
> 
> Sorry for the duplicated patch 3.  The subject:
> [PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity and
> [PATCH 3/3] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity
> is equal for the Google mail client and lands in the same
> thread.  I'd use Mutt.

I do use mutt, and see two copies of this patch sent.

What happened to patch 1/3, I never got that.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux