On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 23:44 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:03:49PM +0100, Paul McQuade wrote: > > -int InterfaceFileDownload( PVOID psIntfAdapter, > > - struct file *flp, > > - unsigned int on_chip_loc); > > +int InterfaceFileDownload(PVOID psIntfAdapter, > > + struct file *flp, > > + unsigned int on_chip_loc); > > > The very first line in this patch is totally wrong... :( > > This is an automated patch. It is? It doesn't look like an automated patch to me. It looks like there are too many different style choices for it to have been done by a machine. Why do you think that? Paul, how did you create this patch? Dan, if you get a chance, could you try to use checkpatch with the --fix option with specific --types like SPACING and PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT and tell me if you think it's OK? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel