Re: [PATCH-RESEND 20/23] staging/lustre/lprocfs: interpret result of dt_statfs() correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:40:57PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> From: "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> In a7369bcd860af61a073cb2424139e3acccdcb203, I accidentally reversed
>
> That commit id means nothing here, in the kernel, so I'll not apply this
> patch for now, sorry.  Please fix this and resend it.
>
Thanks. I'll fix and resend it.

And I noticed that somehow I didn't get notifications of bellow two
patches being queued:

[PATCH-RESEND 15/23] staging/lustre/changelog: fix CL_LAYOUT, accept all types
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-June/038763.html

[PATCH-RESEND 17/23] staging/lustre/changelog: fix CL_LAYOUT comment, string
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-June/038765.html

Could you please confirm if they were queued? Do I need to resend them as well?

Thanks,
Tao
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux