On 05/15/2013 01:09 PM, Seth Jennings wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:55:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> Sorry, but I don't think that's appropriate for a patch in the MM subsystem. >> >> Perhaps a compromise can be reached where this code is merged as a driver >> not a core mm component. There is a high bar to be in the MM - it has to >> work with many many different configurations. >> >> And drivers don't have such a high bar. They just need to work on a specific >> issue and that is it. If zswap ended up in say, drivers/mm that would make >> it more palpable I think. The issue is not whether it is a loadable module or a driver. Nobody here is stupid enough to say, "hey, now it's a driver/module, all of the complex VM interactions are finally fixed!" If folks don't want this in their system, there's a way to turn it off, today, with the sysfs tunables. We don't need _another_ way to turn it off at runtime (unloading the module/driver). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
