On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> msglen comes from get_user() so we need to check that it's not too
> large.
>
> The first element of "pioctl_dpram" is a short which holds the size of
> the data the user wants. I have chosen a limit which lets us fill the
> rest of the struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> msglen is also apparently network endian? My guess is that we should
> just delete this code instead of trying to fix it.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> index 3251d2e..e0056c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> @@ -703,6 +703,8 @@ static long ft1000_ioctl (struct file *file, unsigned int command,
> break;
> msglen = htons(msglen);
> //DEBUG("FT1000:ft1000_ioctl:msg length = %x\n", msglen);
> + if (msglen > sizeof(*pioctl_dpram) - sizeof(short))
> + msglen = sizeof(*pioctl_dpram) - sizeof(short);
doing this may be wrong too? because its in network endian format.
does deleting msglen = htons(msglen)
and adding your change makes sense?
> if(copy_to_user (&pioctl_dpram->pseudohdr, pdpram_blk->pbuffer, msglen))
> {
> DEBUG("FT1000:ft1000_ioctl: copy fault occurred\n");
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
