On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:09:10PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:03:59AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Then should I just mark the driver as broken on ARM? Well, at least ARM on SMP, for !SMP the missing function is defined and will be inlined. > Any reason for not including the driver authors on the Cc: for this > patch? I wasn't sure who the driver author is in the long list of persons from the get_maintainer script. So it was more or less lazyness :) Should I try to get that patch through the driver authors instead of you? Joerg _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
