On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Bjorn Bringert <bringert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I did implement ashmem_read, but I had no idea what I was doing. Calling the
> VFS read function seemed like an obvious way to do it, but it might be
> wrong. If that needs fixing, then the similar VFS call in ashmem_llseek
> probably needs fixing too.
You don't want to hold ashmem_mutex across the VFS calls. It is only
needed to protect the ashmem-internal structures.
FWIW is Android now using ashmem_read()? I left it out of the original
ashmem implementation on purpose.
Robert
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
