On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 16:57 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mirsal Ennaime <mirsal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * Use tabs
> > * Remove a few "80-columns" checkpatch warnings
> > * Separate code paths with empty lines for readability
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mirsal Ennaime <mirsal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/android/binder.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
> > index 43f823d..4652cd8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
> > @@ -2927,57 +2927,69 @@ static void binder_deferred_release(struct binder_proc *proc)
> > {
> > struct binder_transaction *t;
> > struct rb_node *n;
> > - int threads, nodes, incoming_refs, outgoing_refs, buffers, active_transactions, page_count;
> > + int threads, nodes, incoming_refs, outgoing_refs, buffers,
> > + active_transactions, page_count;
> >
> > BUG_ON(proc->vma);
> > BUG_ON(proc->files);
> >
> > hlist_del(&proc->proc_node);
> > +
> > if (binder_context_mgr_node && binder_context_mgr_node->proc == proc) {
> > binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_DEAD_BINDER,
> > - "binder_release: %d context_mgr_node gone\n",
> > - proc->pid);
> > + "binder_release: %d context_mgr_node gone\n",
> > + proc->pid);
>
> I don't like this change (and the others like it). If is not uncommon
> the align arguments on that don't fit the first line with the
> arguments on the first line, so why change it here?
I actually took the "no tabs for indentation" rule a bit too literally.
Fixed in v3, thank you!
--
mirsal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
