On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:37:13PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> - outb((unsigned char) DAC_TEST_PARMS[0], (pVBInfo->P3c8 + 1));
> - outb((unsigned char) DAC_TEST_PARMS[1], (pVBInfo->P3c8 + 1));
> - outb((unsigned char) DAC_TEST_PARMS[2], (pVBInfo->P3c8 + 1));
> + for (i = 0; i < 256 * 3; i++) {
> + outb(0x0F, (pVBInfo->P3c8 + 1)); /* DAC_TEST_PARMS */
The original code looks buggy, but it's been that way from the
initial commit so I have no idea what was intended. Perhaps the
"+ 1" was supposed to be a "+ i". There is no way to know really.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
