On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:03:28PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:47:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> Hi Fengguang, > > > > Please don't top-post. > > > >> Greg said he doesn't accept any z* friends patches in staging excpet > >> plain bug fix and promotion patches until promotion is done. > > > > This is a bugfix, why shouldn't I take it? > > I am really welcome if you accept the patch for zram. > But I saw you said to Dan that you don't accept zsmalloc, zram and > zcache patches > any more unless the patch is obvious bug fix or for promoting it. > So I am really confused about the criteria of bugfix you have thought > because I thought > Fengguang's patch is clean-up patch so I just meant to help you. > I believe obvious bug fix is things to make trouble without it in real > practice, NOT imagine as if stable_kernel_rules.txt said. The patch fixed an obvious sparse warning, so I took it. That falls under my "no new features, bugfixes only" rule. Hope this helps, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
