On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:07:10AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: > On 01/27/2013 09:47 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi Seth, > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: > >> These patches are the first 4 patches of the zswap patchset I > >> sent out previously. Some recent commits to zsmalloc and > >> zcache in staging-next forced a rebase. While I was at it, Nitin > >> (zsmalloc maintainer) requested I break these 4 patches out from > >> the zswap patchset, since they stand on their own. > > > > [2/4] and [4/4] is okay to merge current zsmalloc in staging but > > [1/4] and [3/4] is dependent on zswap so it should be part of > > zswap patchset. > > Just to clarify, patches 1 and 3 are _not_ dependent on zswap. They > just introduce changes that are only needed by zswap. I don't think so. If zswap might be not merged, we don't need [1, 3] at the moment. You could argue that [1, 3] make zsmalloc more flexible and I agree. BUT I want it when we have needs. It would be not too late. So [1,3] should be part of zswap patchset. > > Seth > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
