On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:39:37PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 7 ++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 5 ++++
> 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> index 1508e51..c2ff239 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,8 @@
> /* Xen vector callback to receive events in a HVM domain */
> #define XEN_HVM_EVTCHN_CALLBACK 0xf3
>
> +/* Hyper-V vector callback to receive vmbus interrupts*/
> +#define HYPER_V_CALLBACK_VECTOR 0xf2
Btw, could those hypervisor vectors be merged into one VIRT_INTR_VECTOR
and be shared between the hypervisors? I mean, you can't have a xen and
hyperv hypervisor running next to each other and fihgting over that
vector, right?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
