On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:03:38PM +0100, Laurent Navet [Mali] wrote:
> From: "Laurent Navet [Mali]" <laurent.navet@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> staging: line6: pcm.c
> call to obsolete simple_strtoul() function is replaced
> by kstrtoint() in pcm_set_impulse_period().
> Also check the return code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet [Mali] <laurent.navet@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/line6/pcm.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/line6/pcm.c b/drivers/staging/line6/pcm.c
> index a0ce781..876ab89 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/line6/pcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/line6/pcm.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,13 @@ static ssize_t pcm_set_impulse_period(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> - dev2pcm(dev)->impulse_period = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
> + int value;
> + int rv;
This uses spaces instead of tabs. Run scripts/checkpatch.pl over
the patch before submitting.
Put a blank line here between the declarations and the code.
I see that you copied "rv" from the other places in the file and
generally matching the context is good, but in this case I think
"rv" is non-standard. Normally we would use "ret" or "rc".
> + rv = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &value);
> + if (rv < 0)
> + return rv;
Could you fix up those small details and resend?
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
