On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 19:14 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:08 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 18:34 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: > > > Move ipack header files to include/linux/ directory where they belong to. > > > > Why do these belong in include/linux? > > They are used for other drivers that could be in other directories. But are not currently. > > What's wrong with path relative includes? > > There is nothing wrong with relative includes. It's just to do the > things as other subsystems do: keeping the bus' header file in > include/linux directory. > > Is this approach wrong for this case? There's enough clutter in include/linux, so until these includes are used by other directory drivers, I think so, yes. cheers, Joe _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
