From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> We had assigned the return value to 'ret' but ignored it when return from isl29018_write_raw(), it's better to return 'ret' instead of 0. dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch. (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch) Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c index 3b03f6f..1d5b294 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int isl29018_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, } mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); - return 0; + return ret; } static int isl29018_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
