Line continuations are not normal kernel style. Bleat a warning when used outside of a macro definition. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:02 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 05:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > waOn Mon, 2012-10-22 at 10:37 +0100, David Howells wrote: > > > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 23:33 +0100, Ken O'Brien wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > - pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to " > > > > > + pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to " \ > > > > > "map pages in userspace, no vma\n", proc->pid); > > > > ... > > > > Nice try, but the "right" way to do this is to coalesce formats like: > > > > > > > > pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to map pages in userspace, no vma\n", > > > > proc->pid); > > > > > > Surely the right way is to fix _checkpatch_ to see ["]\n\s*["] and merge the > > > lines before checking them? We shouldn't have to fix up the source in either > > > of these fashions just because checkpatch is broken. > > > > checkpatch is stupid, but it's not broken here. > > > > Formats should be coalesced into a single line to make > > grepping the source for dmesg output easier. > > But MODULE_PARM_DESC() multi-line strings are ok, right? > I don't think so. Maybe this patch: scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 21a9f5d..d4ea29a 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -3011,6 +3011,14 @@ sub process { "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis\n" . "$herectx"); } } + +# check for line continuations outside of #defines + + } else { + if ($line =~ /^\+.*\\$/) { + WARN("LINE_CONTINUATIONS", + "Avoid unnecessary line continuations\n" . $herecurr); + } } # do {} while (0) macro tests: _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel