On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:03:31PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:45 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; > > apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools: hv: Return the full kernel version > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:40:10PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Currently, we are returning the same string for both OSBuildNumber > > > and OSVersion keys. Return the full uts string for the OSBuild > > > key since Windows does not impose any restrictions on this. > > > > You sent me 2 patches, both 1/1, that modify the same file. Which one > > comes first? Please resend both properly, and also let me know if these > > are things that should be going into 3.7 or can wait for 3.8. > > Initially, I sent them out in the order I wanted them > applied. I will resend them as a patch set. They can wait for 3.8. The "order" you send them isn't always the order they are received by people, that is why you need to have the X/2 numbering scheme. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
