Re: [PATCH v4] dma-debug: New interfaces to debug dma mapping errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:07:20 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Still seems overly complicated to me, but whatev.
> > > 
> > > I think the way to handle this is pretty simple: set a flag in the dma
> > > entry when someone runs dma_mapping_error() and, if that flag wasn't
> > > set at unmap time, emit a loud warning.
> > > 
> > > From my reading of the code, this patch indeed does that, along with a
> > > bunch of other (unnecessary?) stuff.  But boy, the changelog conceals
> > > this information well!
> > 
> > Are you referring to the system wide error counters when you say
> > unnecessary stuff. The reason I added those was to catch errors when
> > drivers don't do unmap. Several drivers fail to do unmap. Checking flag
> > from unmap debug interfaces, doesn't cover these cases. However, I think
> > the value of system wide counters is limited in the sense that they
> > don't really identify the driver that needs fixing. In that sense it can
> > be deemed unnecessary. I dropped them in v5 patch, which I am sending
> > out.
> 
> hm.  Could we keep a counter of the number of map/unmap calls within
> the dma object and then emit a warning if that is non-zero at teardown
> time?  That should identify the offending driver.
> 

Thanks. That would work. Will take a look and see what it takes to
implement.

-- Shuah



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux