Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Improve swiotlb performance by using physical addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> While working on 10Gb/s routing performance I found a significant amount of
> time was being spent in the swiotlb DMA handler.  Further digging found that a
> significant amount of this was due to the fact that virtual to physical
> address translation and calling the function that did it.  It accounted for
> nearly 60% of the total overhead.

Can you find out why that is? Traditionally virt_to_phys was just a
subtraction. Then later on it was a if and a subtraction.

It cannot really be that expensive. Do you have some debugging enabled?

Really virt_to_phys should be fixed. Such fundamental operations
shouldn't slow. I don't think hacking up all the users to work
around this is the r ight way.

Looking at the code a bit someone (crazy) made it out of line.
But that cannot explain that much overhead.


-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux