On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:27:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:00:09AM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:11 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, there are new smatch warnings show up in > > > > > > > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git staging-next > > > > head: 3cd73bc1cf59b2c9232d9889ba2b148e262054b6 > > > > commit: 8c7e4277c1197d31c0b34dbaf23e6edddb5978f7 [253/267] staging: comedi: s626: cleanup request_irq in s626_attach_pci() > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:1428 s626_ai_cmd() Error invalid range 4096 to -1 > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:1448 s626_ai_cmd() Error invalid range 4096 to -1 > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:1649 s626_ai_cmdtest() Error invalid range 4096 to -1 > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:1656 s626_ai_cmdtest() Error invalid range 4096 to -1 > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:2504 s626_attach_pci() warn: '(dev->private)->base_addr' was not released on error > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:2516 s626_attach_pci() warn: '(dev->private)->base_addr' was not released on error > > > > + drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c:2516 s626_attach_pci() warn: 'pcidev->irq' was not released on error > > Gar. That check produces too many false positives because of logic > like comedi's. I want to move it under --spammy. > > Fengguang, that would be ok with you? I have no strong idea about this because I've not run into many such "not released on error" warnings. I don't quite get the "invalid range 4096 to -1" warnings and they show up quite often. What's your typical way to tell whether it's a false warning? Thanks, Fengguang _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
