On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:34:11PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote: > Some patches from the v1 sequence of 9 patches that were nothing to do > with mixing __user and kernel pointers have already been applied by > Greg, leaving 4 patches unapplied. For v2, I've combined 2 of those 4 > patches, reordered them, slightly modified one of them and changed the > commit messages. > > Patch 1 in v2 corresponds to patch 4 in v1. Patch 2 in v2 corresponds > to patch 9 in v1. Patch 3 in v2 corresponds to patches 1 and 2 in v1. > > I should point out that Dan Carpenter objected to this change in v1 and > nothing has been done to address that in v2. It's a difference of > opinion. > Yep. I do still think that this patchset is the wrong idea and the current code is cleaner. I don't understand the urgency either. But it's your code... *shrug*. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
