On 09/21/2012 09:14 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: >>> +#define MAX_CLIENTS 16 >> > >> > Seems a bit arbitrary. Why 16? > Sasha Levin posted a patch to fix this but it was tied in to > the proposed KVM implementation, so was never merged. > My patch changed the max pools per client, not the maximum amount of clients. That patch has already found it's way in. (MAX_CLIENTS does look like an arbitrary number though). Thanks, Sasha _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
