Using the call to the ipack_device_unregister() function to avoid the
strange way it was doing, as the device model will take care of calling
the bus's .remove function when a device is being unregistered.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
index c1ce311..293456b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ static u16 tpci200_status_error[] = {
static struct ipack_bus_ops tpci200_bus_ops;
-static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev);
-
static struct tpci200_board *check_slot(struct ipack_device *dev)
{
struct tpci200_board *tpci200;
@@ -387,7 +385,6 @@ static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
tpci200->slots[dev->slot].dev = NULL;
- ipack_device_unregister(dev);
mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
return 0;
@@ -616,7 +613,7 @@ static void tpci200_uninstall(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < TPCI200_NB_SLOT; i++)
- tpci200_slot_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev);
+ ipack_device_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev);
tpci200_unregister(tpci200);
kfree(tpci200->slots);
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
