On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:35:26AM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:11 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:11:41PM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > >> This is a repost of the big patch to remove all the subdevice pointer > >> math. The big patch is now broken up into pieces that only change > >> single files. > >> > >> Let me know if they should be combined into larger chuncks. > >> > >> The s626 and jr3_pci drivers still need a bit of work so they are > >> not included in this cleanup. > >> > >> H Hartley Sweeten (112): > > > > While 112 individual patches might have been a bit extreme, I think it > > was the right thing to do here, thanks for breaking it all up. They are > > now all applied to the staging-next tree, thanks for doing this. > > Yah, it was quite a bit of traffic... I did limit the To and Cc to just the > devel list and you to try and limit the noise. Hope that was the right > thing to do. Yes, that was fine. > BTW, should I keep copying future patches to LKML or just the devel > list, you, and Ian Abbott? I'd stick with keeping lkml off of the cc:, I doubt they care about these patches. I can't answer for Ian, but I know I want a copy to ensure that I get them properly. > Also, I'm not sure why someone complained (LOUDLY) about the > emails. Oh well... Happens every time a large patch set is sent out, don't worry about it :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
