> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:39 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; > apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; thozza@xxxxxxxxxx; > dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:24:37PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:59AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > > This patchset was authored by Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. Ben > > > > asked me to submit this patchset. This patchset cleans up the KVP daemon > > > > code and fixes some bugs. > > > > > > > > > > > > K. Y. Srinivasan (4): > > > > tools: hv: Fix file handle leak > > > > tools: hv: Fix exit() error code > > > > tools: hv: Check for read/write errors > > > > tools: hv: Parse /etc/os-release > > > > > > If Ben wrote these, why are you showing that you wrote them? > > > > Ben asked me to apply these patches on the tip (of my tree) and send the > > patches out and that is what I did. I recreated these patches after applying to > > my tree and that is what I have sent out. How could I have made the authorship > > more clear (other than noting so in the comment which I have done). > > You could have actually _kept_ the proper authorship information so that > git shows who wrote the patch. As your shortlog shows above, it looks > like you wrote the patches, not Ben, which is not acceptable. Obviously, I did not know how I could have done this. I will figure out the correct way of doing this and resubmit these patches. Thanks, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
