On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 05:15:17AM -0700, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 01:55:56PM -0400, Kevin McKinney wrote: > > This patch replaces an invalid device id of 0x132 > > with the correct device id of 0x172 as reported > > by Rinat Camalov <richman1000000d@xxxxxxxxx>. > > > > It could be that both IDs are valid. It wouldn't hurt to leave the > old one in until we were certain. > > -#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_226 0x0132 > +#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_226 0x0132 /* not sure if this is valid */ > +#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_ZTE_226 0x0172 > > Then add it to the InterfaceUsbtable[] array at the top of > drivers/staging/bcm/InterfaceInit.c > > Also I would be interested to know if Rinat was actually able to get > the device to work or was it only loading. I agree, let's get some confirmation here first. I've dropped this patch for now. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
