On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:35:05PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Wait, what do you mean by "non-rebaseable"? I think you mean > > "non-bisectable" right? > > I mean, the branch will not be rebased to fixup errors in the middle. > Like the Linus' tree, and the tip/net trees. For these branches that > cannot afford to rebase, bug fixes always get appended rather than get > folded into the buggy commit. > > For the non-rebaseable branches, I'll first build test the branch HEAD, > and iff it has build errors, go back to locate the first commit that > introduces the errors. This way, it can avoid sending out pointless > warnings about known bugs that are eventually fixed up in the HEAD. None of my trees and branches should ever be rebased, unless something really wrong goes on. I think I've only had to ever do this once, for one branch, in the past years that I've been doing this. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
