On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36:14AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On the TODO list I read convert from sysfs to configfs. Great. That > means it should become what I suggested some time ago. > > The ccg code is thight on sysfs, there is hardly generic code available > which could be reused with the configfs interface. > So can we remove ccg from staging right away? I don't see the point in > keeping it. The user interface changes completely. And while I convert > in tree gadgets / composite users I have to update ccg for no reason. > Ach, I am probably okay with helping Andrzej with his configfs work. > > Okay to remove it? Why would you remove it if people are still using it today? Don't you want to fix it up properly and move it into the real part of the kernel instead? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
