On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:01:32 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In file included from drivers/staging/ccg/ccg.c:59:0: > drivers/staging/ccg/../../usb/gadget/f_fs.c:41:0: warning: "pr_vdebug" redefined > drivers/staging/ccg/../../usb/gadget/u_serial.c:138:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition <looks at drivers/staging/ccg/ccg.c> : /* : * Kbuild is not very cooperative with respect to linking separately : * compiled library objects into one module. So for now we won't use : * separate compilation ... ensuring init/exit sections work to shrink : * the runtime footprint, and giving us at least some parts of what : * a "gcc --combine ... part1.c part2.c part3.c ... " build would. : */ : #include "../../usb/gadget/usbstring.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/config.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/epautoconf.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/composite.c" : : #include "../../usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/u_serial.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/f_acm.c" : #define USB_ETH_RNDIS y : #include "../../usb/gadget/f_rndis.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/rndis.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/u_ether.c" : #include "../../usb/gadget/f_fs.c" What nonsense is this? Who wrote that rotten comment? What does "not very cooperative" mean? This alleged lack of cooperation is the central issue, but you couldn't be bothered actually describing it? How the heck is anyone else to understand the problem and suggest fixes? argh. It talks about library objects. Really? Is there a .a file involved here, or is that just a thinko? If there is indeed a .a file then I'm not surprised there are problems: don't do that. If instead we're just talking about a bunch of .o files then I'm rather curious to know what "not very cooperative" means. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
