On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11:55PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:40 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:49AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:26 AM > > > > To: KY Srinivasan > > > > Cc: apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx; > > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > Are you still missing it; do you want me to resend the whole set? > > > > > > > > Nope, it showed up a few hours later, thanks. You really should get > > > > that fixed... > > > > > > Greg, some additional testing with VM replication on Windows Server > > > 2012 has revealed some issues with this patch-set. Please drop the > > > patch set, I will fix the problem and resend it. > > > > Thanks for letting me know, now dropped. > > > > But, for the next round, I suggest you run this patchset by the netdev > > developers, as I think you are doing things in an "odd" way for some of > > the ip determination. > > Will do. Just curious; can you be more explicit on what part appeared "odd" > to you. The fact that it was Red Hat specific was the main part, this should be done in a standard way, with standard tools, right? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
