On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 06:00:51PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:06:50AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > In the light of Linus' response, and I said this to Colin already, I'll > > just zap a prz at boot time for pstore/console interface, which means > > that nowadays there shouldn't be any objections to this bunch of fixes. > > > > These are valid fixes for v3.5, they restore old pstore's behavior > > nuances, which I changed accidentaly. > > > > Except for the last patch, which is just a fix I happened to make when > > I got bored of the warning. :-) Not a regression fix, though. > > > > Thanks, > > > > --- > > fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +- > > fs/pstore/ram.c | 3 +++ > > fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- > > include/linux/pstore_ram.h | 2 ++ > > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > Hi Greg, > > Have you had a chance to look into these? Plus into > "[PATCH v5 0/11] Merge ram_console into pstore" series, I believe > there were no objections as well. I'm getting there, give me this week to get through them all... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
