On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:17:17PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > This is a longstanding bug, almost unnoticeable when calling > persistent_ram_write() for small buffers. > > But when called for large data buffers, the write routine behaves > incorrectly, as the size may never update: instead of clamping > the size to the maximum buffer size, buffer_size_add_clamp() returns > an error (which is never checked by the write routine, btw). > > To fix this, we now use buffer_size_add() that actually clamps the > size to the max value. > > Also remove buffer_size_add_clamp(), it is no longer needed. > Say if you did notice it, what would that look like? It's just that something gets lost instead of written to the screen right? regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
