On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:42 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-05-11 18:34, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:32 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-11 18:07, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>> +int comedi_pci_driver_register(struct comedi_driver *comedi_driver,
>>>> + struct pci_driver *pci_driver)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = comedi_driver_register(comedi_driver);
>>>> + if (ret< 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_driver->name = comedi_driver->driver_name;
>>>
>>> I think it would be better if the driver modules that call this function
>>> already had pci_driver->name initialized statically.
>>
>> I agree, but this is how all the pci drivers do it now.
>>
>> To change this will require auditing all the comedi pci drivers and adding
>> the static name.
>
> But if you're going to be calling this function from those drivers
> anyway, you might as well add the static names at the same time! Saves
> another round of patches.
True, but many of the pci drivers still need quite a bit of cleanup.
After this patch was accepted I was going to just change the ones
that have already had the init/exit stuff cleaned up. Then as I hit
all the others I would change them.
I guess I could do it this way:
1) add the "name" to all the pci drivers and remove the
"pci_driver->name = comedi_driver->name" from all the
module_init functions.
2) add the module_comedi_pci_driver stuff, without the
"pci_driver->name = comedi_driver->name"
3) Update all the refactored comedi pci drivers to use
the module_comedi_pci_driver macro.
4) As the other comedi pci drivers are refactored, use
the module_comedi_pci_driver macro.
How does that sound?
Regards,
Hartley
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
