The mask value in the read_raw/write_raw is absolute
value, not the bit position value.
Fixing this in the implemented function to check value,
not with the bit position value.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Somehow this was missed on my testing.
I tested today again with linux next and found this issue.
drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
index e705e45..4e6ac24 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int isl29028_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
switch (chan->type) {
case IIO_PROXIMITY:
- if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ_SEPARATE_BIT) {
+ if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) {
dev_err(chip->dev,
"proximity: mask value 0x%08lx not supported\n",
mask);
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int isl29028_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
break;
case IIO_LIGHT:
- if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE_SEPARATE_BIT) {
+ if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) {
dev_err(chip->dev,
"light: mask value 0x%08lx not supported\n",
mask);
@@ -349,14 +349,14 @@ static int isl29028_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
break;
- case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ_SEPARATE_BIT:
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
if (chan->type != IIO_PROXIMITY)
break;
*val = chip->prox_sampling;
ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
break;
- case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE_SEPARATE_BIT:
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
if (chan->type != IIO_LIGHT)
break;
*val = chip->lux_scale;
--
1.7.1.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
