On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:11:58 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:02 -0700, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > Instead of dropping the packet, we keep the skb buffer, and return
> > NETDEV_TX_BUSY to let upper layer retry send. This will not cause
> > endless loop, because the host is taking data away from ring buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 5 +----
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > index 2517d20..dd29478 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > @@ -223,13 +223,10 @@ static int netvsc_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net)
> > net->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
> > net->stats.tx_packets++;
> > } else {
> > - /* we are shutting down or bus overloaded, just drop packet */
> > - net->stats.tx_dropped++;
> > kfree(packet);
> > - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > }
> >
> > - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > + return ret ? NETDEV_TX_BUSY : NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Thats simply not true at all.
>
> A start_xmit() cannot do that.
>
> TX_BUSY should never be returned at all, its a deprecated code, for
> pretty good reasons. (assuming queue is not stopped)
>
> Try this on a machine with one CPU, I am pretty sure this can trigger
> complete freezes.
>
> Once softirq loops in your start_xmit(), how do you think one process
> can help you now ?
Eric is right, look how devices with real physical rings work.
They test for space left at end of start xmit and stop the transmit
queue with netif_stop_queue. The transmit done code then re-enables
when enough space is netif_wake_queue. Think of it as classic
high/low water mark on a FIFO.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
