> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 1:38 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alan Stern; > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Drivers: hv: Support the newly introduced KVP > messages in the driver > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:36:16PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > Dan, > > > > Sorry I could not get back to you earlier. You are right, in that I am trusting > > the host! I am of the firm belief that in a virtualized environment, if you don't > trust > > the host, there is not a whole lot you can do in a guest! I have had this > arguments > > with other on this mailing list in the past. Having said that, I think we have spent > more > > time debating this than we should; your proposal is reasonable and I will go > ahead and > > re-spin those patches based on your comments. I should be posting them > shortly. > > > > Regards, > > It's not about trusting the host or not trusting the host. It's > about "if you're going to specify a limitter, it can't be off by one > even if you don't expect to hit the limit". > > But thanks for redoing these. Thank you, for taking the time to review. Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
