2012/2/15 Víctor M. Jáquez L. <vjaquez@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader code >> >> or prepare the baseimages to be common so we can get rid of specific >> >> loaders and just dump them into memory. >> > >> > I'd say the less workarounds, the better. >> >> If there are ever more base images compatible with the dsp, I would >> say that unifying them into a common format to be dumped in memory >> isn't a workaround, and in that process we can get rid of the custom >> loader code. > > Yes! please! and use Ohad's rproc thingy. I thought rproc is tied to elf for now. > What would be the steps to unify that common format? I guess we will depend on > TI for that... Do we? But this "common" format would be specific for tidspbridge, I don't think it makes sense for these images to have that constraint. Certainly rproc doesn't have it, and that one is not on staging. In any case, the proposed patch looks good. We can deal about these futuristic situations later on. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
