Hi, > > I'll take this, but you do know there is no reason for this, as these > > are static functions. I'd recommend keeping them as short as possible, > > but hey, it's not my code... > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > I agree with Greg on this one. At the time I didn't prefix these > functions with the module name because I wanted to make them clear they > were different. The difference lies in the fact that those functions > are only used to implement the sysfs interface. Yeah, maybe you are right. I thought it was just an oversight. I can send a patch that will get orig names back if you prefer. -- Szymon K. Janc szymon@xxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
