Re: [PATCH 05/34] staging: bcm: for loop neatening

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 22:03 +0000, Julie Sullivan wrote:
> OK, so it's probably obvious to everyone else, but please indulge a
> newbie. Why do we need a for() here? I've looked at the source file
> and I'm missing whatever it is.
> (I guess it must be deliberate, it's in more than one place in the source file.)
> 
> -               for (uiLoopIndex=0; uiLoopIndex < 1; uiLoopIndex++)
> +               for (uiLoopIndex = 0; uiLoopIndex < 1; uiLoopIndex++)

Hi Julie.

It's not at all obvious.

Presumably it was larger once and the person
making the change decided to be lazy.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux