> > Update Copyright to 2012 > > > > The kernel code is owned by the submitter and everyone has their own > corporate policies. If you really need to do this then fine. But hopefully no > one else sees this and thinks it's a good idea. Yes this is what I'm custom to do at Intel: for example http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132588855403574&w=2 > > Obviously if everyone else decided to update the tens of thousands of > copyright notices it would then that's a massive pain in the backside. I think copyright should state year of first publication or publication of derivative work. Seriously I will rise it with our legal department as I understand this not so clear from the dry law statement as the code is changing constantly. Thanks Tomas _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
