On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:46:23 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The magic you are looking for is: "depends on m"? The original > driver used this so it should be fine for the broken out ones as > well. Great! This is, IMHO, the best solution. > > 4) Modify the driver to work right in the mixed case. I don't want > > to do this only because it fixes an edge case only hit by people who > > use all config yes or config random. > > Those are very important people and we don't want to annoy them. > > Can you redo the patchset, and move that one export from patch 2 to > patch 1? Yes, but if I don't get it out tonight, it might be a few days. I have a big gig coming up (or at least big for us :D ) so I may not have time to get at it. Cheers, Sean _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
