Hi,
Please ignore this patch and look at the newer one.
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.c b/drivers/staging/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.c
> index 0e4feac..b768563 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.c
> @@ -876,13 +876,13 @@ static ssize_t ca91cx42_master_read(struct vme_master_resource *image,
> * maximal configured data cycle is used and splits it
> * automatically for non-aligned addresses.
> */
> - if ((int)addr & 0x1) {
> + if ((uintptr_t)addr & 0x1) {
> *(u8 *)buf = ioread8(addr);
> done += 1;
> if (done == count)
> goto out;
> }
> - if ((int)addr & 0x2) {
> + if ((uintptr_t)addr & 0x2) {
> if ((count - done) < 2) {
> *(u8 *)(buf + done) = ioread8(addr + done);
> done += 1;
> @@ -930,13 +930,13 @@ static ssize_t ca91cx42_master_write(struct vme_master_resource *image,
> /* Here we apply for the same strategy we do in master_read
> * function in order to assure D16 cycle when required.
> */
> - if ((int)addr & 0x1) {
> + if ((uintptr_t)addr & 0x1) {
> iowrite8(*(u8 *)buf, addr);
> done += 1;
> if (done == count)
> goto out;
> }
> - if ((int)addr & 0x2) {
> + if ((uintptr_t)addr & 0x2) {
> if ((count - done) < 2) {
> iowrite8(*(u8 *)(buf + done), addr + done);
> done += 1;
> @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static unsigned int ca91cx42_master_rmw(struct vme_master_resource *image,
> /* Lock image */
> spin_lock(&image->lock);
>
> - pci_addr = (u32)image->kern_base + offset;
> + pci_addr = (uintptr_t)image->kern_base + offset;
>
> /* Address must be 4-byte aligned */
> if (pci_addr & 0x3) {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
--
/manohar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
