On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:44:14 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em 16-10-2011 09:45, Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Stefan Richter > > <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Piotr, > >> > >> thanks for getting this going again. - I have not yet looked through the > >> source but have some small remarks on the patch format. > >> > >> - In your changelogs and in the diffs, somehow the space between real > >> name and e-mail address got lost. > >> > >> - The repetition of the Subject: line as first line in the changelog is > >> unnecessary (and would cause an undesired duplication e.g. when git-am > >> is used, last time I checked). > >> > >> - AFAICT, author of patch 1/7 is not Devin but you. Hence the From: line > >> right above the changelog is wrong. > >> > >> - The reference to the source hg tree is very helpful. However, since > >> the as102 related history in there is very well laid out, it may be > >> beneficial to quote some of this prior history. I suggest, include > >> the changelog of "as102: import initial as102 driver", > >> http://kernellabs.com/hg/~dheitmueller/v4l-dvb-as102-2/rev/a78bda1e1a0b > >> (but mark it clearly as a quote from the out-of-tree repo), and include > >> a shortlog from this commit inclusive until the head commit inclusive. > >> (Note, the hg author field appears to be wrong; some of the changes > >> apparently need to be attributed to Pierrick Hascoet as author.) > >> This would IMO improve the picture of who contributed what when this > >> goes into mainline git history, even though the hg history needed to > >> be discarded. > >> > >> - A diffstat is always very nice to have in a patch posting. Most tools > >> for patch generation make it easy to add, and it helps the recipients > >> of the patch posting. > >> (Also, a diffstat of all patches combined would be good to have in the > >> introductory PATCH 0/n posting, but not many developers take the time > >> to do so.) > >> > >> Again, thanks for the effort and also thanks to Devin for making it > >> possible. > > > > I think collapsing my entire patch series in to a single patch would > > not be acceptable, as it loses the entire history of what code was > > originally delivered by Abilis as well as what changes I made. The > > fact that it's from multiple authors (including a commercial entity > > contributing the code) makes this worse. > > > > I think the tree does need to be rebased, but I don't think the entire > > patch series would need to be reworked to be on staging from the > > beginning. You could probably import the first patch (as102: import > > initial as102 driver), fix the usb_alloc_coherent() so that it > > compiles (and put a note in it saying you did), apply the rest of the > > patch series, and then add a final patch that says something like > > "moving to staging as code is not production ready". This would allow > > the history to be preserved without having to rebase every patch to > > deal with the files being moved to the staging tree. > > Rebasing a changeset to move it to staging is not as complex as it seems. > I did it with tm6000 at the time I merged it. A simple bash script could > do that. Something like (untested): > > $ git export some_base_reference > $ for i in 00*.patch; do sed s,/drivers/media/video,/drivers/staging,g <$i >a && mv a $i; done > $ mkdir patches/ > $ mv 00*.patches patches/ > $ (cd patches; ls *.patch > series) > $ git quiltimport > > Of course, the Makefike/Kconfig patch will need changes, but this is as easy > as just dropping the hunks that are touching at /drivers/media/video/Makefile > and /drivers/media/video/Kconfig, and then adding a final patch adding it to > the /drivers/staging/*. > > > > > An alternative would be make a minor tweak to my first patch which > > removes the driver from the makefile. Then every patch in the patch > > series wouldn't actually have to compile successfully until the very > > end when you add it back into the Makefile. This is a luxury you can > > do when it's a brand new driver. > > > > When it's a brand new driver there is a bit more flexibility as long > > as you don't break "git bisect". Both of the approaches described > > above accomplish that. > > > > Mauro, what do you think? > > Didn't actually reviewed the changeset, but let me comment about the > submission procedure. > > Folding patches from different authors generally is not a good idea. > As Devin said, things like replacing "foo" by "bar" because "foo" core > function were replaced by "bar" upstream is the kind of thing that you > could fold, if you properly document it with: > > [john@john_email.com: replaced "foo" by "bar" to fix compilation] > > So, you should rebase the patchsets, instead of just folding everything. > It is up to you to change the patches on each patch, or to do it only at > a final patch. Both ways work for me. > > I suggest you to remove the Kconfig/Makefile hunks that enables the driver > compilation from the original series, and apply it as a final patch at the > end. This makes your rebasing work easier, as you won't need to test patch > by patch if they are not breaking compilation. > > In any case, when analyzing a driver submission like that, I generally just > apply everything from a quilt series, see the final result and review it, > as: > 1) the history doesn't matter for me; > 2) it is easier to review a new driver as a hole, as the history > may be full of things that will later be changed by something else; > 3) checkpatch will be happier, especially if you've added some > patches to fix checkpatch complains at the end of the series. > > Btw, I've agreed with Greg that I'll be moving the media staging stuff into > a separate directory. I'll prepare the patches later, probably during the next > merge window, in order to avoid merge conflicts between Greg's tree and mine, > especially since I intend to move some drivers out of staging, as they seem > to be ready to be at drivers/media. > > So, if you're submitting a new driver for staging, I suggest you to put it already > into drivers/staging/media. This mean one less driver for me to move on my > upcoming changeset ;) > > I hope that helps. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks for comments for all of you. [PATCH 1-12/14] Following your guidelines i exported all changes from hg one by one. This way we will have all history in kernel tree. I moved driver to staging/media and removed Kconfig/Makefile changes in parent directory in first patch. [PATCH 13/14] Fixes compilation and introduces Kconfig/Makefile changes in staging (which probably you'll need to change anyway in your tree). [PATCH 14/14] Adds nBox tuner I have, so i can test the driver (works fine). I think we can take care of making checkpatch happy when the driver will be in place. I'll resend my previous patches (esp. "[PATCH 4/7] as102: cleanup - formatting code" needs some more work). Stats for package: drivers/staging/Kconfig | 2 drivers/staging/Makefile | 1 drivers/staging/media/as102/Kconfig | 7 drivers/staging/media/as102/Makefile | 5 drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_drv.c | 454 ++++++++-- drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_drv.h | 147 +++ drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fe.c | 1131 +++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.c | 337 ++++++- drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_fw.h | 42 drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_usb_drv.c | 584 +++++++++++- drivers/staging/media/as102/as102_usb_drv.h | 72 + drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_cmd.c | 983 ++++++++++++++++----- drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_cmd.h | 540 +++++++++++ drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_cmd_cfg.c | 492 ++++++++-- drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_cmd_stream.c | 555 ++++++++---- drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_handle.h | 58 + drivers/staging/media/as102/as10x_types.h | 198 ++++ 17 files changed, 4705 insertions(+), 903 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
