Adding the check for if (sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD)) is
good, but introducing the new "reset_pass" variable is wrong.
I don't think you are updating the new variable consistently on
all paths. For example, if it's a 0x5209 chip and the code is like
this:
retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
}
In the old system that was considered a successful reset, but under
your new system we don't update "reset_pass" here so we pass this
test and then we immediately return STATUS_FAIL because reset_pass
isn't set. If that's what you intended then just write it like that.
retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
So could you write it again but just set retval = STATUS_FAIL; for
the new failure pathes. Or better yet, just return STATUS_FAIL
directly. So this code would be:
> + if (retval == STATUS_SUCCESS)
> + reset_pass = 1;
if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS)
TRACE_RET(chip, retval);
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
