On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:00:02PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The host gurantees that there can be only one kvp transaction active > against the guest. So, the transaction active state is needed only to > protect against spurious user level calls. The current code had a race > condition where the guest could prematurely return because the previous > transaction state was not cleared - this state was being cleared after > sending the response to the host and there was a window where the host > could notify the guest of a new transaction before the transaction active > state was properly set. > Also deal with the case when the user mode component > does not respond in a timely fashion correctly. > I would like to thank Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > for identifying the problem. So that would be a "Reported-by:" tag, we don't have a "Diagnosed-by" do we? And should this go to the older (i.e. stable) kernels as well? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
