On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 06:53:20PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 06:37:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > This patch series moves nvec to the current state we are using since > > this week. It incorporates the patch series Marc posted in August, but > > integrated with that one to avoid patches changing the same thing > > twice (rewriting a function two times is not entirely helpful). > > > > The diffstat starts with a patch from me to make nvec build again > > on linux-next. Then, the old patches from Marc, and then my new > > patches. The patches are checkpatch.pl clean, as well as the > > final files. > > > > Greg, it would be great if you could take a look at them and merge > > them. In case there are conflicts, it would be great if you could > > tell us which patches you have that conflict. The patch set is > > against todays linux-next, and build fines, once someone has > > fixed arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c (it includes a non-existing > > header). > Any more comments on the patches would be appreciated. I have already > fixed the bugs Dan Carpenter pointed out locally, but those did not > cover all patches (yet?), and more comments are appreciated. Nothing from me, care to resend the updated patches based on Dan's review, and the other acked-by line? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
