On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:55:58PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > The irqsave and irqrestore aren't needed because this function is > > only called from the irq handler. Otherwise the nvec->state on the > > next line would have to be protected by the lock. > OK. This probably also means that the local_irq_save() and > local_irq_restore() in nvec_interrupt() are unneeded as > well, right? Yes. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
