Greg KH wrote at Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:57 PM: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:24:04AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Jean Delvare wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 3:25 AM: ... > > > > Why not make it platform data for now and 'if' it becomes way more common > > > > (probably won't) we can always propose adding as a general field at a later > > > > date. > > > > > > Yes, this sounds like a much more reasonable approach. > > > > BTW, if that's the direction that's decided, just take the first version > > of the patchset I posted, plus Jonathan Cameron's subsequent patch to > > modify ak8975 to accept GPIO ID through platform data. > > I don't know which patchset that would be, can you please just resend > what you want applied so that I know I get the correct one? Sorry for the slow response; I was on vacation for the last couple weeks. I've now posted an updated version of this patchset, without any of the changes for I2C/SPI core/types/... -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
