On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:24:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:48:48AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Get rid of the unused "name" field in struct hv_driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/hv/hyperv.h | 2 --
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv.h b/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv.h
> > index b8199f4..60ead66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv.h
> > @@ -802,8 +802,6 @@ struct hv_device_info {
> >
> > /* Base driver object */
> > struct hv_driver {
> > - const char *name;
>
> Wait, why is this unused? What are you going to use as your name for
> the driver in sysfs then? The module name?
>
> As much as I love seeing things deleted, I really think you need this
> field.
>
> Ah, yeah, I see why you think it's unneeded, crud like this in the
> drivers:
>
> drv->driver.name = driver_name;
>
> No vmbus driver should ever have to touch the base struct driver on it's
> own at all. Your vmbus core should properly handle telling the driver
> core what the name of the driver is.
>
> As an example, see the __pci_register_driver() function, the first thing
> that code does is set the name based on the name of the larger
> pci_driver structure passed to it.
>
> Man, if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself, let
> me go make these changes so you don't have to do any new work at this
> point in time, hopefully your other patches will apply...
What, vmbus_child_driver_register() takes a struct driver *?
No wonder things are so messed up here, and why you got confused. Let
me pound on this for a bit to see if I can get it cleaned up to be more
"sane"...
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
